Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Bohl

Court of Appeals of Colorado, First Division

November 1, 2018

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joshua Thomas BOHL, Defendant-Appellant.

         Adams County District Court No. 14CR3620, Honorable Thomas R. Ensor, Judge

         Cynthia H. Coffman, Attorney General, Elizabeth Ford Milani, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee

          Megan A. Ring, Colorado State Public Defender, Andrea R. Gammell, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant

         OPINION

         FOX, JUDGE

         [¶ 1] Defendant, Joshua Thomas Bohl, appeals the trial court’s decision denying him access to juror contact information. We affirm. Because the record lacks evidence of jury misconduct, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to release juror contact information.

          I. Background

         [¶ 2] A jury convicted Bohl of one count of first degree murder for killing his girlfriend, Jayme Hosier.

          A. Bohl’s Trial

         [¶ 3] During a four-day trial, the prosecution presented evidence that Bohl killed Hosier in a Commerce City apartment. Bohl initially told police that Hosier died when a television accidentally fell on her head, but the forensic pathologist determined that Hosier died from asphyxiation due to blunt force trauma to the neck. The key dispute at trial was whether Bohl had the requisite intent to commit first degree murder. The prosecution’s pathologist said that pressure to Hosier’s neck would

Page 908

have had to continue for three to five minutes before she died, but the defense expert testified that Hosier could have died sooner, helping to negate intent.

          B. Post-Trial Hearings

         [¶ 4] The day after the verdict, a deputy district attorney who was not involved in prosecuting the case sent a text message to Shelley Hillesheim, the wife of jury foreman Mark Hillesheim. Mrs. Hillesheim and the deputy district attorney knew each other, and the deputy district attorney asked if Mr. Hillesheim would provide feedback on the trial and the prosecutors’ performance during the case. Mrs. Hillesheim replied as follows:

The minute Mark got selected to sit on the case, I knew he would be the foreman too. I told him I was calling it. He took it very seriously too. It kind of amused me. He would come up and look up and research various scientific items that were presented, etc. He said he even mapped out his own timeline of events so he could try to put it together in his mind. He said he’d be more than happy to share his feedback. He took lots of notes and still is frustrated by certain things.

         [¶ 5] Following this communication, the People filed a "Notice of Juror Contact" with the trial court. In response, Bohl’s counsel quickly filed a motion for a new trial. In addition to requesting a new trial, Bohl requested alternatively that the court hold a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.