Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DTC Energy Group, Inc. v. Hirschfeld

United States District Court, D. Colorado

March 2, 2018

DTC ENERGY GROUP, INC., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
ADAM HIRSCHFELD, JOSEPH GALBAN, and ALLY CONSULTING, LLC f/k/a WYODAK STAFFING, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Defendants.

          ORDER

          PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge.

         This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Amended Motion and Supporting Memorandum for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 25]. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367.

         I. BACKGROUND

         Plaintiff DTC Energy Group initiated this lawsuit on July 14, 2017. Docket No. 1. On the same day, plaintiff moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction based on the alleged misappropriation of plaintiff's trade secrets by defendants Adam Hirschfeld, Joseph Galban, and Ally Consulting, LLC. Docket No. 4. After a hearing on the motion on August 1, 2017, the Court denied plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order, finding that plaintiff had failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of its misappropriation claims. See Docket No. 17 at 69. On September 13, 2017, plaintiff filed an amended complaint and an amended motion for a preliminary injunction. Docket Nos. 24, 25. Plaintiff's amended motion seeks injunctive relief against defendants Adam Hirschfeld, Joseph Galban, and Ally Consulting, LLC based on four claims in the amended complaint: (1) misappropriation of trade secrets under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1831 et seq., and the Colorado Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”), Colo. Rev. Stat § 7-74-101 et seq.; (2) breach of contract; (3) breach of the duty of loyalty; and (4) unfair competition. See Docket No. 25 at 2, 6-16. After the Court denied Mr. Hirschfeld's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings [Docket No. 26] on January 4, 2018, see Docket No. 37, defendants filed responses to plaintiff's amended motion for a preliminary injunction. Docket Nos. 39, 42. On January 30, 2018, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on plaintiff's motion. Docket No. 56.

         II. FINDINGS OF FACT

         The Court makes the following findings of fact based on the parties' filings and the evidence presented at the January 30, 2018 evidentiary hearing:

         1. Plaintiff DTC Energy Group, Inc. is a Colorado corporation that provides consulting and staffing services for onshore oil and gas companies in the United States. See Docket No. 24 at 3, ¶ 7. The focus of DTC's business is the placement of supervisory personnel, including site supervisors, operations engineers, and project managers, with oil and gas producers. Bob Sylar and Luke Clausen co-owned DTC until May 1, 2017, when Luke Clausen bought Mr. Sylar's equity interest to become sole owner of the company.

         2. Defendant Ally Consulting, LLC, is a Wyoming limited liability company that provides consulting and staffing services for the oil and gas industry. Docket No. 24 at 3, ¶ 10. Ally was formerly known as Wyodak Staffing Services. In 2015, Wyodak was co-owned by Robert Dutton and Joe Johnson. Mr. Clausen testified that the focus of Wyodak's business until at least 2016 was the staffing of directional drillers. Wyodak underwent a name change at some point in late 2015 or early 2016 to become Ally Consulting.

         3. Oil and gas staffing firms work primarily with two groups: consultants and customers. “Consultants” are temporary employees hired by the oil and gas companies to work at well sites. “Customers” are the oil and gas companies who hire the consultants. The identities of consultants and customers are generally known by the oil and gas companies. In addition, their identities are readily available through various online sources. James Colvin, the owner/president of Energy First Consulting, testified that there are no exclusivity agreements binding consultants and both consultants and customers often work with multiple staffing firms at any given time.

         4. In 2013, DTC hired defendant Adam Hirschfeld as a sales associate. Mr. Hirschfeld was ultimately promoted to the position of business development manager. During his employment with DTC, Mr. Hirschfeld was responsible for assessing the staffing needs of oil and gas companies and identifying appropriate candidates to fill those roles. Mr. Hirschfeld's day-to-day work consisted of recruiting consultants and building and maintaining relationships with oil and gas companies.

         5. Mr. Hirschfeld entered into an employment contract with DTC on January 1, 2015. Exhibit 2. Section 11 of contract is a confidentiality provision, which states:

Employee covenants and agrees that he will not at any time during or after the end of the [employment] Term, directly or indirectly, use for his own account, or disclose to any person, firm or corporation, other than authorized employees of the Company . . . Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. As used herein, “Confidential Information” of the Company means information about the Company of any kind, nature or description, including but not limited to, any proprietary information, trade secrets, trade values, data, formulae, supplier, client and customer lists or requirements, price lists or pricing structures, marketing and sales information, business plans or dealings and financial information and plans as well as all papers, resumes and records (including computer records) that are disclosed to or otherwise known to Employee as a direct or indirect consequence of Employee's employment with the Company, which information is not generally known to the public or in the businesses in which the Company is engaged. Confidential information also includes any information furnished to the Company by a third party with restrictions on its use or further disclosure.

Exhibit 2 at 4, ¶ 11. The contract also contains a nonsolicitation provision. Subsection

         (a) of that provision states:

[W]hile employed by the Company, and for a one-year period thereafter, Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit or influence or attempt to solicit or influence any current customer, client, vendor or supplier of the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries to divert their business to any Competitor . . . of the Company . . . or otherwise terminate its relationship with the Company for any purpose or no purpose, provided, however, that this Section 12 shall not be applicable . . . in the event of a termination of this agreement by the Employee without Good Reason but because there has been a change in the current equity ownership of the Company.

Id. at 5, ¶ 12(a). Subsection (b) further provides:

Employee agrees that, while employed by the Company and for a one-year period thereafter, Employee will not, directly or indirectly, induce, solicit or recruit any employee or consultant of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates for the purpose of (A) being employed by Employee or by any Competitor of the Company or (B) interfering with or terminating his or her employment relationship with the Company for any purpose or no purpose.

Id., ¶ 12(b)(ii). In the event of a breach by the employee, the contract states that DTC shall have the “right and remedy to have each and every one of the covenants in this Agreement specifically enforced and the right and remedy to obtain injunctive relief, it being agreed that any breach or threatened breach of any of the confidentiality, nonsolicitation, or other restrictive covenants and agreements contained herein would cause irreparable injury to the Company and that money damages would not provide an adequate remedy at law.” Id. at 5-6, ¶ 13(a).

         6. In November 2014, DTC hired defendant Joseph Galban as a staff accountant. There is no evidence that Mr. Galban signed an employment agreement with DTC.

         7. Mr. Hirschfeld and Mr. Galban resigned from DTC on May 31, 2017 and went to work for Ally. Mr. Hirschfeld currently serves as Ally's head of business development; Mr. Galban works for ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.