Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Estate of Walter v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado

March 30, 2016

THE ESTATE OF JOHN PATRICK WALTER, by and through its special administrator, DESIREE’ Y. KLODNICKI, Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, INC.; CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.; HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, LLC; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC; ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC.; CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE PHYSICIANS, P.C.; CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE PHYSICIANS, II, P.C.; CHC COMPANIES, INC.; THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF FREMONT; JAMES BEICKER, individually and in his official capacity as Fremont County Sheriff; TY MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as Fremont County Undersheriff; RAYMOND HERR, M.D., individually; STEPHANIE REPSHIRE, LPN, individually; KATHLEEN MAESTAS, LPN, individually; SHARON ALLEN, M.D., individually; JOHN RANKIN, individually; CARRIE HAMMEL, individually; MICHAEL GIRTEN, individually; MICHAEL ULRICH, individually; ROBERT MILLER, individually; JUSTIN GREEN, individually; GREG OWEN, individually; DUSTIN MAAS, individually; RICHARD SALANO, individually; GLENN ANDERSON, individually; BILLIE BELL, individually; DEPUTY TURNER, individually; BALEY SANDEFUR, individually; ELOYSA TRUJILLO, individually; LILA CLEMMERSON, individually; BRAXTON BUFFINGTON, individually; CHARLENE COMBS, individually; JORDAN PENN, individually SARA LIGHTCAP, individually; DAVID GREEN, individually; JOSHUA POHL, individually; MACKENZIE ROQUEMORE, individually; ASHLEY RAMEY, individually; RANDALL CULLEN, individually; PERRY BURFORD, individually; CAMERON GONZALES, individually; LEE COOK, individually; JAMES WHEATON, individually; JOHN DOES 1-10, individually; JANE DOES 1-10, individually; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; Defendants.

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM

MICHAEL J. WATANABE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

The above-captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c) - Direct Assignment to Magistrate Judges.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall FORTHWITH serve Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before May 17, 2016, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (see Docket No. 9), indicating either unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined. Please note that this date may be earlier than the default deadlines contemplated by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) shall be held on:

May 31, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.
in Courtroom A-502,
Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,
90119th Street,
Denver, Colorado 80294

If this date is not convenient for any counsel/pro se party, he/she should confer with opposing counsel/pro se party and file a motion to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date.

Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any appearance in this court will be entertained unless a motion is filed no less than FIVE (5) business days in advance of the date of appearance.

THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE NOT ENTERED AN APPEARANCE OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a) on or before 21 days prior to scheduling conference. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(d) no discovery shall be sought until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting. No later than five (5) business days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel/pro se parties shall file their proposed Scheduling Order (in PDF) in compliance with the ECF Filing Procedures. In addition, on or before ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.