Buy This Entire Record For
Brown v. McIntosh
United States District Court, D. Colorado
February 16, 2016
ADRIAN BROWN, Plaintiff,
SHERIFF MICHAEL MCINTOSH, in individual and official capacity, BRETT ESKAM, in his individual and official capacity, LUNN TRAIL, in his individual and official capacity, LUIS HERNANDEZ, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID LEHRKE, in his individual and official capacity, IAN AUSTIN, in his individual and official capacity, MATT ESPINOZA, in his individual and official capacity, ROBERT MESCH, in his individual and official capacity, and STEVEN ZITO, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants.
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM FOR DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUGES
KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c) allowing the direct assignment of cases to magistrate judges.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1) The parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c) - Direct Assignment of Magistrate Judges indicating either unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined on or before:
April 11, 2016.
Please note that this date may be earlier or later than the default deadlines contemplated in D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4).
(2) The court shall hold a Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) scheduling and planning conference on
April 18, 2016, at 9:45 a.m. (Mountain Time).
The conference shall be held in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any party, he or she shall file a motion to reschedule the conference to a more convenient time. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be downloaded from the Court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx (Scroll down to the bold heading “Standardized Order Forms”). For patent cases, a copy of a form scheduling order in a patent case can be downloaded from the Court’s website at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ArticleIMagistrateJudges/HonKathleenMTafoya.a spx. Parties shall prepare the appropriate proposed scheduling order in accordance with the Court’s form.
The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures, on or before:
5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on April 11, 2016.
Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed scheduling order on paper to the Clerk’s Office. However, if any party in the case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed scheduling order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures.
The plaintiff shall notify all parties who have not yet entered an appearance of the date and time of the scheduling/planning conference, and shall ...