United States District Court, District of Colorado
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION
PHILIP A. BRIMMER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty filed on December 9, 2014 [Docket No. 47]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on December 9, 2014. No party has objected to the Recommendation.
In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.”Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 47] is ACCEPTED.
2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 36] is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. ...