Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. 709 Santa Barbara Avenue, Pueblo, Colorado

United States District Court, D. Colorado

December 12, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
709 SANTA BARBARA AVENUE, PUEBLO, COLORADO, Defendants.

ORDER ON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE (DOCKET NO. 23)

MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.

This case has been referred to the undersigned by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger for all purposes (see Docket No. 15) upon the consent of the parties (see Docket No. 11) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and the Pilot Program to Implement the Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges.

This matter is before the court on the United States of America's Motion for Default and Final Order of Forfeiture (Docket No. 23). No response has been filed. The court has reviewed the subject motion (Docket No. 23), has taken judicial notice of the court file, and has considered applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and case law. The court now being fully informed makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The court finds:

1. That I have jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the parties to this lawsuit;
2. That venue is proper in the state and District of Colorado;
3. That each party has been given a fair and adequate opportunity to be heard;
4. That the United States commenced this action in rem pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881;
5. That publication has been effected as required by Rule G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, and all known interested parties have been provided an opportunity to respond;
6. That after proper notice, neither the known potential claimants, nor any other third party, has filed a Claim or Answer as to defendant assets as required by Rule G(5) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions;
7. That the Clerk of Court entered a Clerk's default pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a) on October 2, 2014. (Docket No. 21);
8. That based upon the facts and verification set forth in the Verified Complaint, it appears by a preponderance of the evidence that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of defendant assets, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. It further appears that there is cause to issue a forfeiture order under 21 U.S.C. § 881;
9. That the facts and verifications as set forth in the Verified Complaint provide probable cause and an ample basis by a preponderance of the evidence for a final Judgment and Order of Forfeiture as to ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.