United States District Court, D. Colorado
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion to Remand to State Court [Docket No. 27] filed by plaintiffs Justin Sidwell and Terri Sidwell ("plaintiffs") and defendants Gerald McCoy and C.R. England Inc. ("C.R. England").
On March 24, 2014, plaintiffs filed a complaint and demand for jury trial in Weld County District Court. Docket No. 1-4 at 1. Plaintiffs' complaint alleged that plaintiffs were residents of Colorado, defendant C.R. England was a Utah corporation, and defendant Gerald McCoy was a resident of Ohio. Id. at 1, ¶¶ 1-3. On April 22, 2014, C.R. England filed a notice of removal, claiming that this Court has original jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Docket No. 1 at 2, ¶ 4.
According to the motion to remand, Mr. McCoy currently resides in Ohio and accepted service there on August 6, 2014. Docket No. 27 at 2, ¶ 4. However, on August 26, 2014, the parties discovered that at the time plaintiffs filed their complaint, Mr. McCoy resided in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Id. ¶ 5. As a result, and presumably determining that Mr. McCoy was a citizen of Colorado at the time the complaint was filed, the parties believe that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because there was not complete diversity of citizenship at the time plaintiffs filed their complaint in state court. Id. ¶ 6 (citing Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 570-71 (2004)). The following day, the parties jointly moved to remand the case to state court.
Although Grupo Dataflux involves a case originally filed in federal court, 541 U.S. at 568, and, as a result is not completely analogous to this case, which was removed, the parties are correct that diversity of citizenship must exist both at the time the original action was commenced and at the time of removal. Stevens v. Nichols, 130 U.S. 230, 231 (1889) ; Burnham v. First Nat'l Bank of Leoti, 53 F. 163, 165 (8th Cir. 1892); Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Eighmy, 849 F.Supp. 40, 42 (D. Kan. 1994) ("It is well established that when diversity of citizenship is the basis for removal jurisdiction, it must exist both at the time the original action is filed in state court and at the time removal is sought") (citations omitted).
Based on the representation of the parties that defendant Gerald McCoy was a citizen of Colorado when plaintiffs originally brought their action in state court, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action.
For the foregoing reasons, it is
ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Remand to State Court [Docket No. 27] is GRANTED. This case is remanded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) to the District Court, Weld County, ...