Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Binion v. United States

United States District Court, D. Colorado

February 21, 2014

BARBARA BINION, Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER

KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(e), D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.3, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 43.1, the court enters this Trial Preparation Conference Order.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. In order to resolve pretrial issues implicating Fed.R.Evid. 702, the following procedural protocol shall be used:

a. All motions raising issues under Fed.R.Evid. 702 as codified and construed shall be filed by the discovery cut-off date of July 28, 2014, and marshaled thereafter as prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(c).;
b. For each putative expert witness with respect to whom the movant objects for any reason, the movant shall provide the following:
1. whether the movant contends that the testimony of the expert is unnecessary or irrelevant; and if so, why;
2. whether the movant objects to the qualifications of the witness; and if so, why (stated in detail); and
3. whether the movant objects to any opinion to be offered by the expert; and if so:
a. which opinion; and
b. the specific basis and authority for any objection stated and presented in terms of Fed.R.Evid. 401 and/or 702(a), (b), (c), or (d), i.e., whether the objection impugns the relevancy of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion, or whether the objection impugns how the expert has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion; and
c. for each putative expert witness whose necessity, qualifications, or opinions are opposed by the movant, the party offering the expert shall provide in response to the motion the following:
1. a curriculum vitae for the expert;
2. a statement of each opinion to be offered by the expert that is opposed by the movant; and
3. the relevance and bases for each allegedly objectionable statement to be offered ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.