Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Morgan v. Colvin

United States District Court, D. Colorado

February 18, 2014

ANDREW M. MORGAN, Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

JOHN F. WALSH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, James L. Burgess, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration-Region VIII, Denver, CO, Counsel for Defendant.

Christopher R. Alger, McDIVITT LAW FIRM, Denver, CO, Counsel for Plaintiff.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 10, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: October 29, 2013

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 27, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

To the best of their knowledge, neither party anticipates submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated. Plaintiff's current claim does not involve any prior judicial proceedings.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Attorneys for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 20, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 21, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 6, 2014

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Not all parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.