Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Becker v. Colvin

United States District Court, D. Colorado

February 18, 2014

SHAUN R. BECKER, Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Frederick W. Newall #10269, Colorado Springs, CO, for Plaintiff.

John F. Walsh, United States Attorney, J. Benedict GarcĂ­a, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Allan D. Berger, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, Region VIII, Office of the General Counsel, Denver, CO, for Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The parties do not dispute that the Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: September 30, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: October 17, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 28, 2014

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

This case does not raise any unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 28, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 28, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 13, 2014

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.