Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bennett v. Account Control Technology, Inc.

United States District Court, Tenth Circuit

December 6, 2013

ANNETTE BENNETT, Plaintiff,
v.
ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

AMENDED ORDER RESETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING

KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA, Magistrate Judge.

This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch, pursuant to the Order of Reference filed September 20, 2013. See 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) The court shall hold a Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) scheduling and planning conference on

January 13, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. (Mountain Time).

The conference shall be held in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any party[1], he or she shall file a motion to reschedule the conference to a more convenient time. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.

A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be downloaded from the Court's website at www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms (Scroll down to the bold heading "Standardized Order Forms"). Parties shall prepare the proposed scheduling order in accordance with the Court's form.

The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.5.12., on or before:

5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on January 6, 2014.

Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed scheduling order on paper to the Clerk's Office. However, if any party in the case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed scheduling order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures.

The plaintiff shall notify all parties who have not yet entered an appearance of the date and time of the scheduling/planning conference, and shall provide a copy of this Order to those parties.

(2) In preparation for the scheduling/planning conference, the parties are directed to confer in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), on or before:

December 23, 2013.

The court strongly encourages the parties to meet face to face, but should that prove impossible, the parties may meet by telephone conference. All parties are jointly responsible ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.