Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Association

February 15, 2006

KAY SIEVERDING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COLORADO BAR ASSOCIATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Edward W. Nottingham

ORDER

The notice filed as Docket No. 806 by David and Kay Sieverding reveals a misunderstanding of the court's previous orders. It is therefore

ORDERED as follows:

1. Nothing in the court's orders precludes any attorney admitted to practice before this court, including Attorney O'Malley, from filing papers in any court.

2. Nothing in the court's orders precludes either plaintiff, acting pro se, from filing papers with this court.

3. Therefore, Kay and David Sieverding may, within eleven days from the date of this order, file further materials in opposition to any pending attorney fee request by defendants.

Dated this 15th day of February, 2006.

EDWARD W. NOTTINGHAM United States District Judge

20060215

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.