Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McCray v. Smith

February 14, 2006

CHRISTOPHE MCCRAY, AND PENSAL MCCRAY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EDWARD ANTHONY SMITH, E. ANTHONY AND ASSOCIATES, A COLORADO LLC, THE EDIFUS GROUP, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, WILLIAM BOWMAN, JOHN LIESE, FOR MORTGAGES, HOME LOANS DIRECT, A COLORADO LLC, MISTAR FINANCIAL, A COLORADO LLC, JAGUAR GROUP, A COLORADO LLC, AND COUGAR ASSOCIATES, A COLORADO LLC DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

AMENDED ORDER DENYING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOHN LIESE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant John Liese's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint (#32).

1. The Defendant has not complied with applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of Practice dated April 15, 2002, specifically, D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(D),

2. The Defendant did not submit a proposed order as part of the electronic filing, nor submit a proposed order in WordPerfect or Word format to chambers by electronic mail. Both acts are required by D.C. Colo. ECF Proc. V.L.2.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED, without prejudice.

Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

20060214

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.