Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Gillette Co. v. Skyvision
February 8, 2006
THE GILLETTE COMPANY; BRAUN GMBH; AND GILLETTE COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS NORTH AMERICA, PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
SKYVISION, INC.; DANE ROBINSON; AND WATER PIK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties' Stipulated Motion to Vacate the Currently Scheduled Markman Hearing, filed February 7, 2006 ("Motion"). Upon consideration of the Motion, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Markman hearing previously scheduled for March 9, 2006, is VACATED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties shall submit a written statement concerning the status of settlement on or before February 20, 2006.
Wiley Y. Daniel U. S. District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...