Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Streckenbach v. Toyota Motor Corp.

February 8, 2006

HILARY STRECKENBACH, AND OMAR MARTINEZ, PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., TAKATA CORPORATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION BELIEVED TO BE HEADQUARTERED IN JAPAN, TAKATA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, TAKATA RESTRAINT SYSTEMS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, TAKATA NORTH AMERICAN, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, TAKATA SEATBELTS, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, TAKATA SEAT BELTS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LABORATORY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, TI HOLDINGS, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, IRVIN AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, IRVIN INDUSTRIES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, IRVIN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, HALLE & STIEGLITZ, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, HALLE INDUSTRIAL GROUP, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, HALLE INDUSTRIES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, IRVIN INDUSTRIES, INC., N.Y., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, IRVIN INDUSTRIES, INC., MICHIGAN, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, TOKAI RIKA CO., LTD., A FOREIGN CORPORATION BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, DEFENDANT(S).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Patricia A. Coan United States Magistrate Judge

Order Amending Scheduling Order

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order, Doc. # 65, and the Court being fully advised of the grounds therefore, hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion and AMENDS the Scheduling Order as follows:

Plaintiffs shall request two-day expedited transcripts for Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, and Plaintiffs shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) three weeks after receipt of the last scheduled Rule 30(b)(6) deposition.

Defendants shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) forty-five days after the date on which Plaintiffs' expert reports are due; and Rebuttal Expert reports shall be due fifteen days after the date on which Defendants' expert reports are due.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notwithstanding the foregoing agreement of counsel, the current discovery deadline of September 30, 2006 will not be extended.

20060208

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.