The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
This matter is before me on the following:
(1) Cellport's Amended Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. # 30, filed 12/16/05] (the "Motion to Compel");
(2) Cellport's Motion to Extend Expert Disclosure Deadline [Doc. # 32, filed 12/19/05] (the "Motion to Extend: Experts"); and
(3) Cellport's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Requests for Admission and Second Requests for Production of Documents [Doc. # 36, filed 1/4/06] (the "Motion to Extend: Discovery").
I held a hearing on the motions this morning, at which time I was informed that the parties have resolved the issued raised in them. In summary, in accordance with the parties' agreements, and for the reasons stated on the record:
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is DENIED as withdrawn.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Extend: Experts is GRANTED, and the case schedule is modified to the following extent:
Discovery Cut-Off: May 2, 2006
(All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or before the discovery cut-off.)
Dispositive Motions Deadline: June 5, 2006 Expert Disclosures:
(a) The plaintiff shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 6, 2006
(b) The defendants shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before March 6, 2006
(b) The plaintiff shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. ...