Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Griffin v. Furlong

January 30, 2006

CAREY A. GRIFFIN, APPLICANT,
v.
MR. ROBERT FURLONG, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Edward W. Nottingham

ORDER

The motion to stay pending exhaustion (#27) does not make sense. The case has already been dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Whether the one-year statute of limitations contained in ADEPA has run is an issue which is premature. It is therefore

ORDERED that the motion to stay be DENIED.

Dated this 30th day of January, 2006.

EDWARD W. NOTTINGHAM United States District Judge

20060130

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.